You hear all this great stuff about the Kindle but is that just euphoria because e-paper is novel? What do Kindle owners identify as the disadvantages of a Kindle, if any?
A possible downside for kids that have Kindles: the Kindle can read to you (in a lame computer voice) and I wonder if having the "book" read to a kid isn't giving the kid the full benefit they'd get if they had to read each word.
Many of the Kindle negatives I've experienced have already been noted, but one that's not: no page numbers, so referencing a book, say in a paper or essay, gets tricky.
Many of the Kindle negatives I've experienced have already been noted, but one that's not: no page numbers, so referencing a book, say in a paper or essay, gets tricky.
One negative of the Kindle is that it doesn't have a built-in bookstand. That is, something built into the back so it can be held upright as you read it on the table. But that's not something traditional books had either. Still a negative in my eyes.
The biggest disadvantage is that Amazon can delete your books without your permission, as happened recently with a novel by George Orwell. Also, many books are not available for Kindle.
The Kindle has drawbacks: it's way expensive, many users have basic issues with the look-and-feel of the device, and Amazon has not ever disclosed the full limits and conditions of the book licenses (for instance, whether they can suddenly 'revoke' purchased copies of 1984, as recently happened).
I think reading the words on the screen is unappealing. It's not the same as a book, it's worse, and so my reading experience is slightly less positive.
The screen does not have sufficient contrast to be easily readable in all light conditions. As demonstrated recently, Amazon can delete books that you have purchased at their discretion.